method

exists?

v2.1.0 - Show latest stable - 4 notes - Class: ActiveRecord::Base

1.0.0 (0)
1.1.6 (0)
1.2.6 (5)
2.0.3 (17)
2.1.0 (0)
2.2.1 (0)
2.3.8 (11)
3.0.0
3.0.9
3.1.0
3.2.1
3.2.8
3.2.13
4.0.2
4.1.8
4.2.1
4.2.7
4.2.9
5.0.0.1
5.1.7
5.2.3
6.0.0
6.1.3.1
6.1.7.7
7.0.0
7.1.3.2
7.1.3.4
What's this?

exists?(id_or_conditions) public

Checks whether a record exists in the database that matches conditions given. These conditions can either be a single integer representing a primary key id to be found, or a condition to be matched like using ActiveRecord#find.

The id_or_conditions parameter can be an Integer or a String if you want to search the primary key column of the table for a matching id, or if you’re looking to match against a condition you can use an Array or a Hash.

Possible gotcha: You can’t pass in a condition as a string e.g. "name = ‘Jamie’", this would be sanitized and then queried against the primary key column as "id = ‘name = \’Jamie"

Examples

  Person.exists?(5)
  Person.exists?('5')
  Person.exists?(:name => "David")
  Person.exists?(['name LIKE ?', "%#{query}%"])

Show source

# File activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb, line 601
      def exists?(id_or_conditions)
        connection.select_all(
          construct_finder_sql(
            :select     => "#{quoted_table_name}.#{primary_key}",
            :conditions => expand_id_conditions(id_or_conditions),
            :limit      => 1
          ),
          "#{name} Exists"
        ).size > 0
      end

February 3, 2009

3 thanks

Possible gotcha

Please note that exists? doesn’t hold all the conventions of find, i.e. you can’t do:

Person.exists?(:conditions => ['name LIKE ?', "%#{query}%"]) # DOESN'T WORK!

January 30, 2009 - (<= v2.1.0)

3 thanks

Hash conditions require explicit key and value

When condition passed as hash, the behavior is different from a finder method. Finder methods, such as:

find(:all, :user=>user)

will apply the user_id = user.id convention, provided user is an association (e.g. belongs_to :user). The exists? method will not do the same. You must specify the foreign key name and value explicitly, i.e:

exists?(:user_id=>user.id)

September 9, 2010

2 thanks

takes ActiveRecord object as an arg as well

One undocumented feature, you can do this:

person = Person.first
Person.exists?(person)
# => returns true

This came in handy for me when I needed to see if something belonged to a particular scope.

scope = "created_rails"
person = Person.find_by_name "dhh"
Person.send(scope).exists?(person)
# => returns true

Obviously this relies on you having a named_scope in your Person model called “created_rails”.

April 22, 2010

2 thanks

Dynamic exists? methods

There are no dynamic exists? methods analogous to dynamic finders, which means that while you can do this:

Person.find_by_name('David')

you can’t do this:

Person.exists_by_name('David') # DOES NOT WORK

nor this:

Person.exists_by_name?('David') # DOES NOT WORK

However, you can simulate this with dynamic scope:

Person.scoped_by_name('David').exists?

You’ll have to admit that this is so much better than the plain old method:

Person.exists?(:name => "David")