- 1.0.0 (0)
- 1.1.6 (34)
- 1.2.6 (14)
- 2.0.3 (38)
- 2.1.0 (5)
- 2.2.1 (3)
- 2.3.8 (8)
- 3.0.0 (15)
- 3.0.9 (-8)
- 3.1.0 (38)
- 3.2.1 (3)
- 3.2.8 (0)
- 3.2.13 (0)
- 4.0.2 (4)
- 4.1.8 (8)
- 4.2.1 (2)
- 4.2.7 (0)
- 4.2.9 (0)
- 5.0.0.1 (-3)
- 5.1.7 (2)
- 5.2.3 (-2)
- 6.0.0 (1)
- 6.1.3.1 (0)
- 6.1.7.7 (0)
- 7.0.0 (2)
- 7.1.3.2 (5)
- 7.1.3.4 (0)
- What's this?
Associations are a set of macro-like class methods for tying objects together through foreign keys. They express relationships like "Project has one Project Manager" or "Project belongs to a Portfolio". Each macro adds a number of methods to the class which are specialized according to the collection or association symbol and the options hash. It works much the same way as Ruby’s own attr* methods. Example:
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :portfolio has_one :project_manager has_many :milestones has_and_belongs_to_many :categories end
The project class now has the following methods (and more) to ease the traversal and manipulation of its relationships:
- Project#portfolio, Project#portfolio=(portfolio), Project#portfolio.nil?
- Project#project_manager, Project#project_manager=(project_manager), Project#project_manager.nil?,
- Project#milestones.empty?, Project#milestones.size, Project#milestones, Project#milestones<<(milestone), Project#milestones.delete(milestone), Project#milestones.find(milestone_id), Project#milestones.find_all(conditions), Project#milestones.build, Project#milestones.create
- Project#categories.empty?, Project#categories.size, Project#categories, Project#categories<<(category1), Project#categories.delete(category1)
Example
files/examples/associations.png
Is it belongs_to or has_one?
Both express a 1-1 relationship, the difference is mostly where to place the foreign key, which goes on the table for the class saying belongs_to. Example:
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :author end class Author < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :post end
The tables for these classes could look something like:
CREATE TABLE posts ( id int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, title varchar default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) CREATE TABLE authors ( id int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, post_id int(11) default NULL, name varchar default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) )
Unsaved objects and associations
You can manipulate objects and associations before they are saved to the database, but there is some special behaviour you should be aware of, mostly involving the saving of associated objects.
One-to-one associations
- Assigning an object to a has_one association automatically saves that object and the object being replaced (if there is one), in order to update their primary keys - except if the parent object is unsaved (new_record? == true).
- If either of these saves fail (due to one of the objects being invalid) the assignment statement returns false and the assignment is cancelled.
- If you wish to assign an object to a has_one association without saving it, use the #association.build method (documented below).
- Assigning an object to a belongs_to association does not save the object, since the foreign key field belongs on the parent. It does not save the parent either.
Collections
- Adding an object to a collection (has_many or has_and_belongs_to_many) automatically saves that object, except if the parent object (the owner of the collection) is not yet stored in the database.
- If saving any of the objects being added to a collection (via #push or similar) fails, then #push returns false.
- You can add an object to a collection without automatically saving it by using the #collection.build method (documented below).
- All unsaved (new_record? == true) members of the collection are automatically saved when the parent is saved.
Association callbacks
Similiar to the normal callbacks that hook into the lifecycle of an Active Record object, you can also define callbacks that get trigged when you add an object to or removing an object from a association collection. Example:
class Project has_and_belongs_to_many :developers, :after_add => :evaluate_velocity def evaluate_velocity(developer) ... end end
It’s possible to stack callbacks by passing them as an array. Example:
class Project has_and_belongs_to_many :developers, :after_add => [:evaluate_velocity, Proc.new { |p, d| p.shipping_date = Time.now}] end
Possible callbacks are: before_add, after_add, before_remove and after_remove.
Should any of the before_add callbacks throw an exception, the object does not get added to the collection. Same with the before_remove callbacks, if an exception is thrown the object doesn’t get removed.
Association extensions
The proxy objects that controls the access to associations can be extended through anonymous modules. This is especially beneficial for adding new finders, creators, and other factory-type methods that are only used as part of this associatio. Example:
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people do def find_or_create_by_name(name) first_name, *last_name = name.split last_name = last_name.join " " find_or_create_by_first_name_and_last_name(first_name, last_name) end end end person = Account.find(:first).people.find_or_create_by_name("David Heinemeier Hansson") person.first_name # => "David" person.last_name # => "Heinemeier Hansson"
If you need to share the same extensions between many associations, you can use a named extension module. Example:
module FindOrCreateByNameExtension def find_or_create_by_name(name) first_name, *last_name = name.split last_name = last_name.join " " find_or_create_by_first_name_and_last_name(first_name, last_name) end end class Account < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people, :extend => FindOrCreateByNameExtension end class Company < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people, :extend => FindOrCreateByNameExtension end
Caching
All of the methods are built on a simple caching principle that will keep the result of the last query around unless specifically instructed not to. The cache is even shared across methods to make it even cheaper to use the macro-added methods without worrying too much about performance at the first go. Example:
project.milestones # fetches milestones from the database project.milestones.size # uses the milestone cache project.milestones.empty? # uses the milestone cache project.milestones(true).size # fetches milestones from the database project.milestones # uses the milestone cache
Eager loading of associations
Eager loading is a way to find objects of a certain class and a number of named associations along with it in a single SQL call. This is one of the easiest ways of to prevent the dreaded 1+N problem in which fetching 100 posts that each needs to display their author triggers 101 database queries. Through the use of eager loading, the 101 queries can be reduced to 1. Example:
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :author has_many :comments end
Consider the following loop using the class above:
for post in Post.find(:all) puts "Post: " + post.title puts "Written by: " + post.author.name puts "Last comment on: " + post.comments.first.created_on end
To iterate over these one hundred posts, we’ll generate 201 database queries. Let’s first just optimize it for retrieving the author:
for post in Post.find(:all, :include => :author)
This references the name of the belongs_to association that also used the :author symbol, so the find will now weave in a join something like this: LEFT OUTER JOIN authors ON authors.id = posts.author_id. Doing so will cut down the number of queries from 201 to 101.
We can improve upon the situation further by referencing both associations in the finder with:
for post in Post.find(:all, :include => [ :author, :comments ])
That’ll add another join along the lines of: LEFT OUTER JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id. And we’ll be down to 1 query. But that shouldn’t fool you to think that you can pull out huge amounts of data with no performance penalty just because you’ve reduced the number of queries. The database still needs to send all the data to Active Record and it still needs to be processed. So it’s no catch-all for performance problems, but it’s a great way to cut down on the number of queries in a situation as the one described above.
Please note that limited eager loading with has_many and has_and_belongs_to_many associations is not compatible with describing conditions on these eager tables. This will work:
Post.find(:all, :include => :comments, :conditions => "posts.title = 'magic forest'", :limit => 2)
…but this will not (and an ArgumentError will be raised):
Post.find(:all, :include => :comments, :conditions => "comments.body like 'Normal%'", :limit => 2)
Also have in mind that since the eager loading is pulling from multiple tables, you’ll have to disambiguate any column references in both conditions and orders. So :order => "posts.id DESC" will work while :order => "id DESC" will not. This may require that you alter the :order and :conditions on the association definitions themselves.
It’s currently not possible to use eager loading on multiple associations from the same table. Eager loading will also not pull additional attributes on join tables, so "rich associations" with has_and_belongs_to_many is not a good fit for eager loading.
Modules
By default, associations will look for objects within the current module scope. Consider:
module MyApplication module Business class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :clients end class Company < ActiveRecord::Base; end end end
When Firm#clients is called, it’ll in turn call MyApplication::Business::Company.find(firm.id). If you want to associate with a class in another module scope this can be done by specifying the complete class name, such as:
module MyApplication module Business class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base; end end module Billing class Account < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :firm, :class_name => "MyApplication::Business::Firm" end end end
Type safety with ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
If you attempt to assign an object to an association that doesn’t match the inferred or specified :class_name, you’ll get a ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch.
Options
All of the association macros can be specialized through options which makes more complex cases than the simple and guessable ones possible.
Using strings as association names
Beware, that using strings as association names, when giving Hash to :include will render errors:
The error occurred while evaluating nil.name
So, :include => [‘assoc1’, ‘assoc2’ ] will work, and :include => [ {‘assoc1’ => ‘assoc3’}, ‘assoc2’] won’t. Use symbols:
Proper form
:include => [ {:assoc1 => :assoc3}, ‘assoc2’]
finder_sql
If you are using the finder_sql option, it is important to use single quotes if need to interpolate variables, such as the id of the record. Otherwise you will get the object_id of the class.
Using strings as association names - beware of HashWithIndifferentAccess
If you merge a normal Hash into a HashWithIndifferentAccess, then the keys will convert to strings…
This will likely bite you if the merge is passed to AR find: as netmaniac said “Beware, that using strings as association names, when giving Hash to :include will render errors”.
Beware that params from your controller are HashWithIndifferentAccess like.
a misprint?
In section ‘Bi-directional associations’ an example:
d = Dungeon.first
t = d.traps.first
d.level == t.dungeon.level # => true
d.level = 10
d.level == t.dungeon.level # => false
Then use has_many associations, but lower than written ‘for belongs_to associations has_many inverse associations are ignored.’