- 1.0.0 (0)
- 1.1.6 (34)
- 1.2.6 (14)
- 2.0.3 (38)
- 2.1.0 (5)
- 2.2.1 (3)
- 2.3.8 (8)
- 3.0.0 (15)
- 3.0.9 (-8)
- 3.1.0 (38)
- 3.2.1 (3)
- 3.2.8 (0)
- 3.2.13 (0)
- 4.0.2 (4)
- 4.1.8 (8)
- 4.2.1 (2)
- 4.2.7 (0)
- 4.2.9 (0)
- 5.0.0.1 (-3)
- 5.1.7 (2)
- 5.2.3 (-2)
- 6.0.0 (1)
- 6.1.3.1 (0)
- 6.1.7.7 (0)
- 7.0.0 (2)
- 7.1.3.2 (5)
- 7.1.3.4 (0)
- What's this?
Active Record Associations
Associations are a set of macro-like class methods for tying objects together through foreign keys. They express relationships like “Project has one Project Manager” or “Project belongs to a Portfolio”. Each macro adds a number of methods to the class which are specialized according to the collection or association symbol and the options hash. It works much the same way as Ruby’s own attr* methods.
class Project < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :portfolio has_one :project_manager has_many :milestones has_and_belongs_to_many :categories end
The project class now has the following methods (and more) to ease the traversal and manipulation of its relationships:
project = Project.first project.portfolio project.portfolio = Portfolio.first project.reload_portfolio project.project_manager project.project_manager = ProjectManager.first project.reload_project_manager project.milestones.empty? project.milestones.size project.milestones project.milestones << Milestone.first project.milestones.delete(Milestone.first) project.milestones.destroy(Milestone.first) project.milestones.find(Milestone.first.id) project.milestones.build project.milestones.create project.categories.empty? project.categories.size project.categories project.categories << Category.first project.categories.delete(category1) project.categories.destroy(category1)
A word of warning
Don’t create associations that have the same name as {instance methods}[rdoc-ref:ActiveRecord::Core] of +ActiveRecord::Base+. Since the association adds a method with that name to its model, using an association with the same name as one provided by +ActiveRecord::Base+ will override the method inherited through +ActiveRecord::Base+ and will break things. For instance, attributes and connection would be bad choices for association names, because those names already exist in the list of +ActiveRecord::Base+ instance methods.
Auto-generated methods
See also “Instance Public methods” below ( from #belongs_to ) for more details.
Singular associations (one-to-one)
| | belongs_to | generated methods | belongs_to | :polymorphic | has_one ----------------------------------+------------+--------------+--------- other | X | X | X other=(other) | X | X | X build_other(attributes={}) | X | | X create_other(attributes={}) | X | | X create_other!(attributes={}) | X | | X reload_other | X | X | X other_changed? | X | X | other_previously_changed? | X | X |
Collection associations (one-to-many / many-to-many)
| | | has_many generated methods | habtm | has_many | :through ----------------------------------+-------+----------+---------- others | X | X | X others=(other,other,...) | X | X | X other_ids | X | X | X other_ids=(id,id,...) | X | X | X others<< | X | X | X others.push | X | X | X others.concat | X | X | X others.build(attributes={}) | X | X | X others.create(attributes={}) | X | X | X others.create!(attributes={}) | X | X | X others.size | X | X | X others.length | X | X | X others.count | X | X | X others.sum(*args) | X | X | X others.empty? | X | X | X others.clear | X | X | X others.delete(other,other,...) | X | X | X others.delete_all | X | X | X others.destroy(other,other,...) | X | X | X others.destroy_all | X | X | X others.find(*args) | X | X | X others.exists? | X | X | X others.distinct | X | X | X others.reset | X | X | X others.reload | X | X | X
Overriding generated methods
Association methods are generated in a module included into the model class, making overrides easy. The original generated method can thus be called with super:
class Car < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :owner belongs_to :old_owner def owner=(new_owner) self.old_owner = self.owner super end end
The association methods module is included immediately after the generated attributes methods module, meaning an association will override the methods for an attribute with the same name.
Cardinality and associations
Active Record associations can be used to describe one-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many relationships between models. Each model uses an association to describe its role in the relation. The #belongs_to association is always used in the model that has the foreign key.
One-to-one
Use #has_one in the base, and #belongs_to in the associated model.
class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :office end class Office < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :employee # foreign key - employee_id end
One-to-many
Use #has_many in the base, and #belongs_to in the associated model.
class Manager < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :employees end class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :manager # foreign key - manager_id end
Many-to-many
There are two ways to build a many-to-many relationship.
The first way uses a #has_many association with the :through option and a join model, so there are two stages of associations.
class Assignment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :programmer # foreign key - programmer_id belongs_to :project # foreign key - project_id end class Programmer < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :assignments has_many :projects, through: :assignments end class Project < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :assignments has_many :programmers, through: :assignments end
For the second way, use #has_and_belongs_to_many in both models. This requires a join table that has no corresponding model or primary key.
class Programmer < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :projects # foreign keys in the join table end class Project < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :programmers # foreign keys in the join table end
Choosing which way to build a many-to-many relationship is not always simple. If you need to work with the relationship model as its own entity, use #has_many :through. Use #has_and_belongs_to_many when working with legacy schemas or when you never work directly with the relationship itself.
Is it a #belongs_to or #has_one association?
Both express a 1-1 relationship. The difference is mostly where to place the foreign key, which goes on the table for the class declaring the #belongs_to relationship.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base # I reference an account. belongs_to :account end class Account < ActiveRecord::Base # One user references me. has_one :user end
The tables for these classes could look something like:
CREATE TABLE users ( id bigint NOT NULL auto_increment, account_id bigint default NULL, name varchar default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) ) CREATE TABLE accounts ( id bigint NOT NULL auto_increment, name varchar default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (id) )
Unsaved objects and associations
You can manipulate objects and associations before they are saved to the database, but there is some special behavior you should be aware of, mostly involving the saving of associated objects.
You can set the :autosave option on a #has_one, #belongs_to, #has_many, or #has_and_belongs_to_many association. Setting it to true will always save the members, whereas setting it to false will never save the members. More details about :autosave option is available at AutosaveAssociation.
One-to-one associations
-
Assigning an object to a #has_one association automatically saves that object and the object being replaced (if there is one), in order to update their foreign keys - except if the parent object is unsaved (new_record? == true).
-
If either of these saves fail (due to one of the objects being invalid), an ActiveRecord::RecordNotSaved exception is raised and the assignment is cancelled.
-
If you wish to assign an object to a #has_one association without saving it, use the #build_association method (documented below). The object being replaced will still be saved to update its foreign key.
-
Assigning an object to a #belongs_to association does not save the object, since the foreign key field belongs on the parent. It does not save the parent either.
Collections
-
Adding an object to a collection (#has_many or #has_and_belongs_to_many) automatically saves that object, except if the parent object (the owner of the collection) is not yet stored in the database.
-
If saving any of the objects being added to a collection (via push or similar) fails, then push returns false.
-
If saving fails while replacing the collection (via association=), an ActiveRecord::RecordNotSaved exception is raised and the assignment is cancelled.
-
You can add an object to a collection without automatically saving it by using the collection.build method (documented below).
-
All unsaved (new_record? == true) members of the collection are automatically saved when the parent is saved.
Customizing the query
Associations are built from Relation objects, and you can use the Relation syntax to customize them. For example, to add a condition:
class Blog < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :published_posts, -> { where(published: true) }, class_name: 'Post' end
Inside the -> { ... } block you can use all of the usual Relation methods.
Accessing the owner object
Sometimes it is useful to have access to the owner object when building the query. The owner is passed as a parameter to the block. For example, the following association would find all events that occur on the user’s birthday:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :birthday_events, ->(user) { where(starts_on: user.birthday) }, class_name: 'Event' end
Note: Joining or eager loading such associations is not possible because those operations happen before instance creation. Such associations can be preloaded, but doing so will perform N+1 queries because there will be a different scope for each record (similar to preloading polymorphic scopes).
Association callbacks
Similar to the normal callbacks that hook into the life cycle of an Active Record object, you can also define callbacks that get triggered when you add an object to or remove an object from an association collection.
class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :clients, dependent: :destroy, after_add: :congratulate_client, after_remove: :log_after_remove def congratulate_client(record) # ... end def log_after_remove(record) # ... end end
It’s possible to stack callbacks by passing them as an array. Example:
class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :clients, dependent: :destroy, after_add: [:congratulate_client, -> (firm, record) { firm.log << "after_adding#{record.id}" }], after_remove: :log_after_remove end
Possible callbacks are: before_add, after_add, before_remove, and after_remove.
If any of the before_add callbacks throw an exception, the object will not be added to the collection.
Similarly, if any of the before_remove callbacks throw an exception, the object will not be removed from the collection.
Note: To trigger remove callbacks, you must use destroy / destroy_all methods. For example:
-
firm.clients.destroy(client)
-
firm.clients.destroy(*clients)
-
firm.clients.destroy_all
delete / delete_all methods like the following do not trigger remove callbacks:
-
firm.clients.delete(client)
-
firm.clients.delete(*clients)
-
firm.clients.delete_all
Association extensions
The proxy objects that control the access to associations can be extended through anonymous modules. This is especially beneficial for adding new finders, creators, and other factory-type methods that are only used as part of this association.
class Account < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people do def find_or_create_by_name(name) first_name, last_name = name.split(" ", 2) find_or_create_by(first_name: first_name, last_name: last_name) end end end person = Account.first.people.find_or_create_by_name("David Heinemeier Hansson") person.first_name # => "David" person.last_name # => "Heinemeier Hansson"
If you need to share the same extensions between many associations, you can use a named extension module.
module FindOrCreateByNameExtension def find_or_create_by_name(name) first_name, last_name = name.split(" ", 2) find_or_create_by(first_name: first_name, last_name: last_name) end end class Account < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people, -> { extending FindOrCreateByNameExtension } end class Company < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :people, -> { extending FindOrCreateByNameExtension } end
Some extensions can only be made to work with knowledge of the association’s internals. Extensions can access relevant state using the following methods (where items is the name of the association):
-
record.association(:items).owner - Returns the object the association is part of.
-
record.association(:items).reflection - Returns the reflection object that describes the association.
-
record.association(:items).target - Returns the associated object for #belongs_to and #has_one, or the collection of associated objects for #has_many and #has_and_belongs_to_many.
However, inside the actual extension code, you will not have access to the record as above. In this case, you can access proxy_association. For example, record.association(:items) and record.items.proxy_association will return the same object, allowing you to make calls like proxy_association.owner inside association extensions.
Association Join Models
Has Many associations can be configured with the :through option to use an explicit join model to retrieve the data. This operates similarly to a #has_and_belongs_to_many association. The advantage is that you’re able to add validations, callbacks, and extra attributes on the join model. Consider the following schema:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :authorships has_many :books, through: :authorships end class Authorship < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :author belongs_to :book end @author = Author.first @author.authorships.collect { |a| a.book } # selects all books that the author's authorships belong to @author.books # selects all books by using the Authorship join model
You can also go through a #has_many association on the join model:
class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :clients has_many :invoices, through: :clients end class Client < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :firm has_many :invoices end class Invoice < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :client end @firm = Firm.first @firm.clients.flat_map { |c| c.invoices } # select all invoices for all clients of the firm @firm.invoices # selects all invoices by going through the Client join model
Similarly you can go through a #has_one association on the join model:
class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :users has_many :avatars, through: :users end class User < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :group has_one :avatar end class Avatar < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user end @group = Group.first @group.users.collect { |u| u.avatar }.compact # select all avatars for all users in the group @group.avatars # selects all avatars by going through the User join model.
An important caveat with going through #has_one or #has_many associations on the join model is that these associations are read-only. For example, the following would not work following the previous example:
@group.avatars << Avatar.new # this would work if User belonged_to Avatar rather than the other way around @group.avatars.delete(@group.avatars.last) # so would this
Setting Inverses
If you are using a #belongs_to on the join model, it is a good idea to set the :inverse_of option on the #belongs_to, which will mean that the following example works correctly (where tags is a #has_many :through association):
@post = Post.first @tag = @post.tags.build name: "ruby" @tag.save
The last line ought to save the through record (a Tagging). This will only work if the :inverse_of is set:
class Tagging < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :post belongs_to :tag, inverse_of: :taggings end
If you do not set the :inverse_of record, the association will do its best to match itself up with the correct inverse. Automatic inverse detection only works on #has_many, #has_one, and #belongs_to associations.
:foreign_key and :through options on the associations will also prevent the association’s inverse from being found automatically, as will a custom scopes in some cases. See further details in the Active Record Associations guide.
The automatic guessing of the inverse association uses a heuristic based on the name of the class, so it may not work for all associations, especially the ones with non-standard names.
You can turn off the automatic detection of inverse associations by setting the :inverse_of option to false like so:
class Tagging < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :tag, inverse_of: false end
Nested Associations
You can actually specify any association with the :through option, including an association which has a :through option itself. For example:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :posts has_many :comments, through: :posts has_many :commenters, through: :comments end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comments end class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :commenter end @author = Author.first @author.commenters # => People who commented on posts written by the author
An equivalent way of setting up this association this would be:
class Author < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :posts has_many :commenters, through: :posts end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comments has_many :commenters, through: :comments end class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :commenter end
When using a nested association, you will not be able to modify the association because there is not enough information to know what modification to make. For example, if you tried to add a Commenter in the example above, there would be no way to tell how to set up the intermediate Post and Comment objects.
Polymorphic Associations
Polymorphic associations on models are not restricted on what types of models they can be associated with. Rather, they specify an interface that a #has_many association must adhere to.
class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :attachable, polymorphic: true end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :assets, as: :attachable # The :as option specifies the polymorphic interface to use. end @asset.attachable = @post
This works by using a type column in addition to a foreign key to specify the associated record. In the Asset example, you’d need an attachable_id integer column and an attachable_type string column.
Using polymorphic associations in combination with single table inheritance (STI) is a little tricky. In order for the associations to work as expected, ensure that you store the base model for the STI models in the type column of the polymorphic association. To continue with the asset example above, suppose there are guest posts and member posts that use the posts table for STI. In this case, there must be a type column in the posts table.
Note: The attachable_type= method is being called when assigning an attachable. The class_name of the attachable is passed as a String.
class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :attachable, polymorphic: true def attachable_type=(class_name) super(class_name.constantize.base_class.to_s) end end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base # because we store "Post" in attachable_type now dependent: :destroy will work has_many :assets, as: :attachable, dependent: :destroy end class GuestPost < Post end class MemberPost < Post end
Caching
All of the methods are built on a simple caching principle that will keep the result of the last query around unless specifically instructed not to. The cache is even shared across methods to make it even cheaper to use the macro-added methods without worrying too much about performance at the first go.
project.milestones # fetches milestones from the database project.milestones.size # uses the milestone cache project.milestones.empty? # uses the milestone cache project.milestones.reload.size # fetches milestones from the database project.milestones # uses the milestone cache
Eager loading of associations
Eager loading is a way to find objects of a certain class and a number of named associations. It is one of the easiest ways to prevent the dreaded N+1 problem in which fetching 100 posts that each need to display their author triggers 101 database queries. Through the use of eager loading, the number of queries will be reduced from 101 to 2.
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :author has_many :comments end
Consider the following loop using the class above:
Post.all.each do |post| puts "Post: " + post.title puts "Written by: " + post.author.name puts "Last comment on: " + post.comments.first.created_on end
To iterate over these one hundred posts, we’ll generate 201 database queries. Let’s first just optimize it for retrieving the author:
Post.includes(:author).each do |post|
This references the name of the #belongs_to association that also used the :author symbol. After loading the posts, find will collect the author_id from each one and load all of the referenced authors with one query. Doing so will cut down the number of queries from 201 to 102.
We can improve upon the situation further by referencing both associations in the finder with:
Post.includes(:author, :comments).each do |post|
This will load all comments with a single query. This reduces the total number of queries to 3. In general, the number of queries will be 1 plus the number of associations named (except if some of the associations are polymorphic #belongs_to - see below).
To include a deep hierarchy of associations, use a hash:
Post.includes(:author, { comments: { author: :gravatar } }).each do |post|
The above code will load all the comments and all of their associated authors and gravatars. You can mix and match any combination of symbols, arrays, and hashes to retrieve the associations you want to load.
All of this power shouldn’t fool you into thinking that you can pull out huge amounts of data with no performance penalty just because you’ve reduced the number of queries. The database still needs to send all the data to Active Record and it still needs to be processed. So it’s no catch-all for performance problems, but it’s a great way to cut down on the number of queries in a situation as the one described above.
Since only one table is loaded at a time, conditions or orders cannot reference tables other than the main one. If this is the case, Active Record falls back to the previously used LEFT OUTER JOIN based strategy. For example:
Post.includes([:author, :comments]).where(['comments.approved = ?', true])
This will result in a single SQL query with joins along the lines of: LEFT OUTER JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id and LEFT OUTER JOIN authors ON authors.id = posts.author_id. Note that using conditions like this can have unintended consequences. In the above example, posts with no approved comments are not returned at all because the conditions apply to the SQL statement as a whole and not just to the association.
You must disambiguate column references for this fallback to happen, for example order: "author.name DESC" will work but order: "name DESC" will not.
If you want to load all posts (including posts with no approved comments), then write your own LEFT OUTER JOIN query using ON:
Post.joins("LEFT OUTER JOIN comments ON comments.post_id = posts.id AND comments.approved = '1'")
In this case, it is usually more natural to include an association which has conditions defined on it:
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :approved_comments, -> { where(approved: true) }, class_name: 'Comment' end Post.includes(:approved_comments)
This will load posts and eager load the approved_comments association, which contains only those comments that have been approved.
If you eager load an association with a specified :limit option, it will be ignored, returning all the associated objects:
class Picture < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :most_recent_comments, -> { order('id DESC').limit(10) }, class_name: 'Comment' end Picture.includes(:most_recent_comments).first.most_recent_comments # => returns all associated comments.
Eager loading is supported with polymorphic associations.
class Address < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :addressable, polymorphic: true end
A call that tries to eager load the addressable model
Address.includes(:addressable)
This will execute one query to load the addresses and load the addressables with one query per addressable type. For example, if all the addressables are either of class Person or Company, then a total of 3 queries will be executed. The list of addressable types to load is determined on the back of the addresses loaded. This is not supported if Active Record has to fall back to the previous implementation of eager loading and will raise ActiveRecord::EagerLoadPolymorphicError. The reason is that the parent model’s type is a column value so its corresponding table name cannot be put in the FROM/JOIN clauses of that query.
Table Aliasing
Active Record uses table aliasing in the case that a table is referenced multiple times in a join. If a table is referenced only once, the standard table name is used. The second time, the table is aliased as #{reflection_name}_#{parent_table_name}. Indexes are appended for any more successive uses of the table name.
Post.joins(:comments) # SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments ON ... Post.joins(:special_comments) # STI # SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments ON ... AND comments.type = 'SpecialComment' Post.joins(:comments, :special_comments) # special_comments is the reflection name, posts is the parent table name # SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments ON ... INNER JOIN comments special_comments_posts
Acts as tree example:
TreeMixin.joins(:children) # SELECT ... FROM mixins INNER JOIN mixins childrens_mixins ... TreeMixin.joins(children: :parent) # SELECT ... FROM mixins INNER JOIN mixins childrens_mixins ... # INNER JOIN parents_mixins ... TreeMixin.joins(children: {parent: :children}) # SELECT ... FROM mixins INNER JOIN mixins childrens_mixins ... # INNER JOIN parents_mixins ... # INNER JOIN mixins childrens_mixins_2
Has and Belongs to Many join tables use the same idea, but add a _join suffix:
Post.joins(:categories) # SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN categories_posts ... INNER JOIN categories ... Post.joins(categories: :posts) # SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN categories_posts ... INNER JOIN categories ... # INNER JOIN categories_posts posts_categories_join INNER JOIN posts posts_categories Post.joins(categories: {posts: :categories}) # SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN categories_posts ... INNER JOIN categories ... # INNER JOIN categories_posts posts_categories_join INNER JOIN posts posts_categories # INNER JOIN categories_posts categories_posts_join INNER JOIN categories categories_posts_2
If you wish to specify your own custom joins using ActiveRecord::QueryMethods#joins method, those table names will take precedence over the eager associations:
Post.joins(:comments).joins("inner join comments ...") # SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments_posts ON ... INNER JOIN comments ... Post.joins(:comments, :special_comments).joins("inner join comments ...") # SELECT ... FROM posts INNER JOIN comments comments_posts ON ... # INNER JOIN comments special_comments_posts ... # INNER JOIN comments ...
Table aliases are automatically truncated according to the maximum length of table identifiers according to the specific database.
Modules
By default, associations will look for objects within the current module scope. Consider:
module MyApplication module Business class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :clients end class Client < ActiveRecord::Base; end end end
When Firm#clients is called, it will in turn call MyApplication::Business::Client.find_all_by_firm_id(firm.id). If you want to associate with a class in another module scope, this can be done by specifying the complete class name.
module MyApplication module Business class Firm < ActiveRecord::Base; end end module Billing class Account < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :firm, class_name: "MyApplication::Business::Firm" end end end
Bi-directional associations
When you specify an association, there is usually an association on the associated model that specifies the same relationship in reverse. For example, with the following models:
class Dungeon < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :traps has_one :evil_wizard end class Trap < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :dungeon end class EvilWizard < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :dungeon end
The traps association on Dungeon and the dungeon association on Trap are the inverse of each other, and the inverse of the dungeon association on EvilWizard is the evil_wizard association on Dungeon (and vice-versa). By default, Active Record can guess the inverse of the association based on the name of the class. The result is the following:
d = Dungeon.first t = d.traps.first d.object_id == t.dungeon.object_id # => true
The Dungeon instances d and t.dungeon in the above example refer to the same in-memory instance since the association matches the name of the class. The result would be the same if we added :inverse_of to our model definitions:
class Dungeon < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :traps, inverse_of: :dungeon has_one :evil_wizard, inverse_of: :dungeon end class Trap < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :dungeon, inverse_of: :traps end class EvilWizard < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :dungeon, inverse_of: :evil_wizard end
For more information, see the documentation for the :inverse_of option and the Active Record Associations guide.
Deleting from associations
Dependent associations
#has_many, #has_one, and #belongs_to associations support the :dependent option. This allows you to specify that associated records should be deleted when the owner is deleted.
For example:
class Author has_many :posts, dependent: :destroy end Author.find(1).destroy # => Will destroy all of the author's posts, too
The :dependent option can have different values which specify how the deletion is done. For more information, see the documentation for this option on the different specific association types. When no option is given, the behavior is to do nothing with the associated records when destroying a record.
Note that :dependent is implemented using Rails’ callback system, which works by processing callbacks in order. Therefore, other callbacks declared either before or after the :dependent option can affect what it does.
Note that :dependent option is ignored for #has_one :through associations.
Delete or destroy?
#has_many and #has_and_belongs_to_many associations have the methods destroy, delete, destroy_all and delete_all.
For #has_and_belongs_to_many, delete and destroy are the same: they cause the records in the join table to be removed.
For #has_many, destroy and destroy_all will always call the destroy method of the record(s) being removed so that callbacks are run. However delete and delete_all will either do the deletion according to the strategy specified by the :dependent option, or if no :dependent option is given, then it will follow the default strategy. The default strategy is to do nothing (leave the foreign keys with the parent ids set), except for #has_many :through, where the default strategy is delete_all (delete the join records, without running their callbacks).
There is also a clear method which is the same as delete_all, except that it returns the association rather than the records which have been deleted.
What gets deleted?
There is a potential pitfall here: #has_and_belongs_to_many and #has_many :through associations have records in join tables, as well as the associated records. So when we call one of these deletion methods, what exactly should be deleted?
The answer is that it is assumed that deletion on an association is about removing the link between the owner and the associated object(s), rather than necessarily the associated objects themselves. So with #has_and_belongs_to_many and #has_many :through, the join records will be deleted, but the associated records won’t.
This makes sense if you think about it: if you were to call post.tags.delete(Tag.find_by(name: 'food')) you would want the ‘food’ tag to be unlinked from the post, rather than for the tag itself to be removed from the database.
However, there are examples where this strategy doesn’t make sense. For example, suppose a person has many projects, and each project has many tasks. If we deleted one of a person’s tasks, we would probably not want the project to be deleted. In this scenario, the delete method won’t actually work: it can only be used if the association on the join model is a #belongs_to. In other situations you are expected to perform operations directly on either the associated records or the :through association.
With a regular #has_many there is no distinction between the “associated records” and the “link”, so there is only one choice for what gets deleted.
With #has_and_belongs_to_many and #has_many :through, if you want to delete the associated records themselves, you can always do something along the lines of person.tasks.each(&:destroy).
Type safety with ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch
If you attempt to assign an object to an association that doesn’t match the inferred or specified :class_name, you’ll get an ActiveRecord::AssociationTypeMismatch.
Options
All of the association macros can be specialized through options. This makes cases more complex than the simple and guessable ones possible.
Using strings as association names
Beware, that using strings as association names, when giving Hash to :include will render errors:
The error occurred while evaluating nil.name
So, :include => [‘assoc1’, ‘assoc2’ ] will work, and :include => [ {‘assoc1’ => ‘assoc3’}, ‘assoc2’] won’t. Use symbols:
Proper form
:include => [ {:assoc1 => :assoc3}, ‘assoc2’]
finder_sql
If you are using the finder_sql option, it is important to use single quotes if need to interpolate variables, such as the id of the record. Otherwise you will get the object_id of the class.
Using strings as association names - beware of HashWithIndifferentAccess
If you merge a normal Hash into a HashWithIndifferentAccess, then the keys will convert to strings…
This will likely bite you if the merge is passed to AR find: as netmaniac said “Beware, that using strings as association names, when giving Hash to :include will render errors”.
Beware that params from your controller are HashWithIndifferentAccess like.
a misprint?
In section ‘Bi-directional associations’ an example:
d = Dungeon.first
t = d.traps.first
d.level == t.dungeon.level # => true
d.level = 10
d.level == t.dungeon.level # => false
Then use has_many associations, but lower than written ‘for belongs_to associations has_many inverse associations are ignored.’