module

ActionController::Routing

No documentation available for this module.

Files

  • actionpack/lib/action_controller/routing.rb

Nested classes and modules

3Notes

:use_route to force named routes in url_for

matbrown · Nov 11, 20084 thanks

If you are using a plugin or library that calls url_for internally, you can force it to use a particular named route with the :use_route key. For instance, calling:

url_for(:controller => 'posts', :action => 'view', :id => post, :use_route => :special_post)

will have the same effect as:

special_post_url(post)

Naturally, this is much more verbose if you're calling it directly, but can be a lifesaver if url_for is being called inside another method (e.g. will_paginate).

Set :use_route to nil to let Rails pick the best route

rxcfc · Apr 25, 20094 thanks

Imagine the following case. You have two landing pages, one generic one, and an account specific one. The urls are as follows:

map.landing 'landing', :controller => 'landing', :action => 'index'
map.account_landing 'accounts/:account_id/landing', :controller => 'landing', :action => 'index'

Now imagine you want a path to the landing page, using the most specific route possible. If you have an account_id, use it, if not, skip it.

You could do

url_for(:controller => 'landing', :action => 'index', :account_id => current_account)

If current_account is set you'll get "/accounts/:account_id/landing" if not, you'll get "/landing". However, that just looks ugly.

Enter :use_route => nil.

landing_path(:account_id => nil)                    # => '/landing'
landing_path(:account_id => 1)                      # => '/landing?account_id=1'
landing_path(:account_id => nil, :use_route => nil) # => '/landing'
landing_path(:account_id => 1, :use_route => nil)   # => '/accounts/1/landing'

Setting :use_route to nil, is equivalent to the earlier #url_for example.

Routing changes in Rails 3

noniq · Jul 15, 20102 thanks

See ActionDispatch::Routing for routing in Rails 3.