- 1_8_6_287
- 1_8_7_72
- 1_8_7_330
- 1_9_1_378 (0)
- 1_9_2_180 (-1)
- 1_9_3_125 (6)
- 1_9_3_392 (0)
- 2_1_10 (3)
- 2_2_9 (0)
- 2_4_6
- 2_5_5
- 2_6_3
- What's this?
RDoc::Parser::C attempts to parse C extension files. It looks for the standard patterns that you find in extensions: rb_define_class, rb_define_method and so on. It tries to find the corresponding C source for the methods and extract comments, but if we fail we don’t worry too much.
The comments associated with a Ruby method are extracted from the C comment block associated with the routine that implements that method, that is to say the method whose name is given in the rb_define_method call. For example, you might write:
/* * Returns a new array that is a one-dimensional flattening of this * array (recursively). That is, for every element that is an array, * extract its elements into the new array. * * s = [ 1, 2, 3 ] #=> [1, 2, 3] * t = [ 4, 5, 6, [7, 8] ] #=> [4, 5, 6, [7, 8]] * a = [ s, t, 9, 10 ] #=> [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6, [7, 8]], 9, 10] * a.flatten #=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] */ static VALUE rb_ary_flatten(ary) VALUE ary; { ary = rb_obj_dup(ary); rb_ary_flatten_bang(ary); return ary; } ... void Init_Array() { ... rb_define_method(rb_cArray, "flatten", rb_ary_flatten, 0);
Here RDoc will determine from the rb_define_method line that there’s a method called “flatten” in class Array, and will look for the implementation in the method rb_ary_flatten. It will then use the comment from that method in the HTML output. This method must be in the same source file as the rb_define_method.
The comment blocks may include special directives:
- Document-class: name
-
Documentation for the named class.
- Document-module: name
-
Documentation for the named module.
- Document-const: name
-
Documentation for the named rb_define_const.
Constant values can be supplied on the first line of the comment like so:
/* 300: The highest possible score in bowling */ rb_define_const(cFoo, "PERFECT", INT2FIX(300));
The value can contain internal colons so long as they are escaped with a \
- Document-global: name
-
Documentation for the named rb_define_global_const
- Document-variable: name
-
Documentation for the named rb_define_variable
- Document-method: method_name
-
Documentation for the named method. Use this when the method name is unambiguous.
- Document-method: <tt>ClassName::method_name
-
Documentation for a singleton method in the given class. Use this when the method name alone is ambiguous.
- Document-method: <tt>ClassName#method_name
-
Documentation for a instance method in the given class. Use this when the method name alone is ambiguous.
- Document-attr: name
-
Documentation for the named attribute.
- call-seq: text up to an empty line
-
Because C source doesn’t give descriptive names to Ruby-level parameters, you need to document the calling sequence explicitly
In addition, RDoc assumes by default that the C method implementing a Ruby function is in the same source file as the rb_define_method call. If this isn’t the case, add the comment:
rb_define_method(....); // in filename
As an example, we might have an extension that defines multiple classes in its Init_xxx method. We could document them using
/* * Document-class: MyClass * * Encapsulate the writing and reading of the configuration * file. ... */ /* * Document-method: read_value * * call-seq: * cfg.read_value(key) -> value * cfg.read_value(key} { |key| } -> value * * Return the value corresponding to +key+ from the configuration. * In the second form, if the key isn't found, invoke the * block and return its value. */